Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 5:47:12 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    This is one of the best movies ever. Really Really Good!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 4:54:49 PM | (Age Not Specified) | F

    Wonderful, but the book contained so many details that were missed and filled in the rest of the story. It seemed a little more rushed. The format was different but then again the format of the book changed in book 3. Was there more than one whomping willow?? Or did they just change the location?

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 4:36:53 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

    The movie is great as it covers a lot in 2 hrs & 20mins. Still, many parts from the novel are missing in the movie. People who have not read the books may have hard time to follow with what`s happening in the movie

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 3:48:20 PM | (Age Not Specified) | F

    I really really liked this movie. It had a much darker side, so it was scary! I thought that they should have made the new Dumbledore look more like the old one, but besides that everything was great!!! I can`t wait to see it again!!!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 3:47:17 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I thought that Harry Potter [and the Prisoner of Azkaban] was a good movie but was sort of "rushed". But then again, if they were to include every good detail from the book, it would be a 4 hour movie and think of how long the 4th and 5th movies would be if that was the case. However, I felt that a slight addition to some scenes (like Quidditch and the Shrieking Shack scenes) would add more effect into the film. Overall, I thought it was an exceptional film. The cast has grown into portraying their roles more adequately; specifically Daniel Radcliffe. I thought he did a phenomenal job and being faced with the role of Harry Potter, a fictional

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 3:29:18 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    its short.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 3:10:09 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    It was very different from the other two. STILL it was amazing, Less Magic and Myth, to it and more Mystery and Suspense. I can`t wait till number 4!!! It`s a definit "Must See". :D

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 3:01:14 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    it was a great movie.it was so good im thinking of going to see it again

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 2:56:21 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I LOVED IT!!!!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 2:44:49 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    It was one of the best movies i have ever seen! emma(hermine) is my faveroite character!