Write a Review

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 6:40:29 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  It seemed like it was just thrown together. I didn`t like it and since I didn`t read the book, I left the theatre confused too.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 6:11:08 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Best of the the three!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 5:54:36 PM | (age group: 25-34) | M

  It was OK. More adult and dark so it wasn`t as much "not as good" as the first 2 movies as it was "not what I was expecting". I`ll still go see the next one when it comes out.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 5:26:03 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  This was the best Harry Potter film yet!! Full of humour, mystery, and action. Lupin was an amazing addition to the cast of characters. The characters themselves are more rich, and fully realized, excellent film for the family!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 5:16:36 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  First of all.. As for those of you CONSTANTLY COMPLAINING about how "the movie wasn`t as good as the book" go read the book and and shut up!! As for those of you who haven`t seen or read either of them then I suggest you watch the movie first, Then read the book.. I think the book was better as well but in order to keep in all those details then the movie would end up being like 8 hours long! They did a great job with what they had to work with! The only thing was I don`t think they had a high point in climax, I think it was the director though, so Otherwise great job!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 4:48:33 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I saw the movie twice, I loved it! I know everyone has already pointed out many times that some big things were missing from the movie..but there is still another movie coming. Hopefully everything will get told in the 4th! I think it was awsome, the scene with Buckbeak and Harry was awsome, I loved the scenery! Even though the book had more detail, the movie definitely did a great job fitting in most of it!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 4:32:59 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I still have to go and watch the movie so I am still not sure ?

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 4:28:19 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I thought the moive was great! Alfonso did a great job at directing it. The book is much more darker then the first two, so thus is the movie. Micheal Gambon did a great job at playing Prof. Dumbledore. He`s not trying to be Richard Harris. He`s doing Dumbledore his own way. And I liked it. Remus Lupin wasn`t up to how I imagined him but when he spoke to Harry, you know it was the Remus from the book. Even though stuff changed, some people need to remember that Harry, Ron, and Hermione are growing up. They need to change. Yes stuff was cut out and stuff was added. Some say the location of the Whomping Willow, but remember you see the Whomping

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 4:20:28 PM | (age group: 2-17)

  I loved the movie. But i wish they had included the scene where Malfoy Crab and Goyl dress up as dementors and Harry summons the patronos on them.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 13, 2004 3:22:13 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  If you didn`t read the book I guess it`s okay, but if you did read the book you`re going to find it disappointing. I didn`t really like it.