Write a Review

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:37:51 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  emma is so hott! the movie was really good. i know they made a lot of changes from the book, but who cares when Harry got his broom. or where the tree is. it was a great movie and you should see it. ppl said it was childish but i am 15 and i really liked it. I saw it 3 times. Harry, Ron and Hermione were so good.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, June 27, 2004 1:00:18 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  Harry potter was good. except the misssed a ton of stuff which really annoyed me cause that was like important. (well some of it) otherwise it was quite good. i think it was probably the best harry potter movie yet. and probably will stay the best harry potter movie.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Saturday, June 26, 2004 6:55:24 PM | (age group: 35–49) | M

  I was disappointed.The director took liberties that destroyed the story. Where were all the interesting ideas from the book? I didn`t care about ghost horses in the castle, I would have rather that they spent the time on the map and on Mr. Black. My children were looking forward to being as scared as they were while we read them the book. My son actually fell asleep during the movie. I have also not seen that many people get up and leave the theater in the middle of a movie since I saw Rainman.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Saturday, June 26, 2004 2:35:16 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  hmm, what would make the most money? shrek 2, harry potter 3 or spider-man 2? i should say thet will be amazzzzzinggg movies but i think spidey 2 will me more money but still amazing. cant wait till the 4th, 5th, 6th and the 7th movie and books come out.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Saturday, June 26, 2004 11:02:03 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I think the movie was great but don`t change any more characters insept the ones that have to be changed by the book but like Harry , Ron and Hermoine they should stay the same every one likes them and the play the characters well.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Saturday, June 26, 2004 12:32:12 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Seriously dissapointing

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Friday, June 25, 2004 8:19:26 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  The Best one yet. Can`t wait for it to come out on DVD.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Friday, June 25, 2004 5:42:15 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I loved the movie, everthing except for the end, they rushed the end. they should of slowed it down, so u really understood what happened.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Friday, June 25, 2004 2:01:13 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

  I think it was the best out of the three even though it was the shortest and it did not follow the book very well. If it was not based on a book it would be considered a great movie one of the best of the year. I wish there was more quidich and the new dumbledore was really bad. They should have got Ian McKellen (Gandalf LOTR)to play as Dumbledore, He would have been able to do a better job at it. They should have keept more to the movie and to the way the first two movies were done it would have made the third movie a much better experience. It still was one of the best movies I have ever seen and I am defently going to see it a couple

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Friday, June 25, 2004 8:47:21 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I love harry potter, but i didn`t like that movie. the book was better and the movies before. i think it was the director of this one. it was so different.