Write a Review

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:05:37 PM | (age group: 35–49) | F

  Not nearly as good as the first two. Why did they change the setting. I don`t remember Hogwards being on a mountain side!!! They should go back to the original director, he did a much better job. My whole family was disappointed. I agree that they left out too much. I`d rather stay for another 30-45 minutes to get the whole story.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Tuesday, July 13, 2004 4:00:35 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  i really hope they stop makin the harry potter movies bcus they`re RUINING them! They should have waited until all the books were out, then made the movies. and they shouldn`t keep gettin directors that SUCK!! this movie was awful! surprise, surprise. these stupid movies dont even come close to lord of the rings, which were very well made movies. and by the way, harry, ron and hermione are NOT hot! they`re all ugly!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:53:38 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I thought this movie was just brilliant. Daniel looks so HOT in the movie and it felt a bit weird watching him cry and stuff. But i don`t really blame him for crying even though he is the bravest one of tham all.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Tuesday, July 13, 2004 3:41:16 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  the story is very intrestingand there are also funny and imaginative storylines

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:59:54 AM | (age group: 18-24) | F

  harry potter 3, on frist viewing did not at all live up to the previous movie...however watching it again i did change my opinion b/c the second time i went in with an open mind. so many things were different in this movie ie the set design, even the fat lady was different....but oh well it is made now, and all we can do i hope that the next one stays truier to the book and the first two movies

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 12, 2004 10:21:25 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  It was good but they left out to much information that was needed in the story. Like why Peter betrayed Harry`s parents and why Snape hates Harry so much. They need to stick to the book more.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 12, 2004 6:23:45 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  It was good but it went too fast. Many things are different because I litteraly know the book by heart and a lot of things aren`t in there. Also, Harry is at Hogwarts 15 minutes into the movie...pretty fast huh?

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 12, 2004 11:16:24 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  The movie was cool, but it needed more it was way diffrent from the book but still i liked it. thanks J.K Rowling for the excellent books. Emma (elmo)H

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 11, 2004 8:22:42 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  that the movie was a stupid one

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 11, 2004 6:02:24 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

  wat the hell was up wit the ending??? missed parts but still blew away other 2 movies! if a fan go see it!!!