Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 7, 2004 8:19:42 AM | (Age Not Specified)

    The first two we very good. This one did not measure up. It left out a lot of details from the book and seemed shallow and less emotional. The setting was radically different fromt he first two...almost like it was another place altogether. It lacked the chrisma of the first two movies.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 7, 2004 2:29:34 AM | (age group: 35–49) | F

    Too dark, strayed too far from the book (too many details were left out - definitely could have been longer) and seems to have lost the charm the first two exhibited. Though Harry, Ron & Hermione will always be great!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 7, 2004 12:51:32 AM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    I definitely enjoyed the "two places at once" part. Poor Ron. -Cheers.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:44:29 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

    Great film. Well done. COuld have been longer

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:14:21 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    AMAZING

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 10:10:02 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    Didn`t enjoy this movie as much as the 1st and 2nd one, storyline went by way too fast, all they talked about was who they were afraid of and stuff, it was just pointless they skipped so many parts too while the 1st and 2nd movie they had almost all the parts

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 9:44:17 PM | (age group: 2-17)

    What makes HP so great are the funny scenarios and unique ideas that Hogwarts is a real place. This movie totally forgot about that as it rushed to include every bit of plot detail making for a choppy-dark-off centre film. I miss Chris Columbos...this movie was a huge disappointment...but I still love you HP!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 9:37:18 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    It was the best movie out of all three! The effects were awesome. The only thing i didn`t like about it is that they left out a lot of great things from the book. It was fantastic!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 9:28:47 PM | (Age Not Specified) | M

    A very good and well-directed movie. The style is noticeably different (Columbus aimed at a younger age than Cuaron) but the quality is not taken away at all. If anything (with all due respect to Chris Columbus) this movie surpasses the first two easily. Most notably is how much darker and scarier this is from the first two. I nearly wet myself when I first saw the Dementors as me and my two other friends sat in a row surrounded by 8 year olds at the early show. They were just as frightened as us, it was then that it struck me, this is too scary for the majority of the people who`ve read the book. My only grievance is the lack of quiddi

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 9:28:10 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    i thought it was the best out of the 3i also thought it also really lived up to book and i cant wait till it comes out on dvd.