Write a Review

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 6:05:49 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  AWESOME MOVIE!!!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 5:15:48 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  the director SUCKED SO BADLY!! he cut WAY too many scenes out, the movie HARDLY made any sense if you havent read the book (but i have). new characters just appeared out of nowhere, and a lot of things should have been enphizised. i think its a great movie but the director SUCKS. i hope they have a new one for the 4th movie, HOPE. and i really dont want them to replace the cast in the 5th one!! ahh

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 4:52:20 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  BREATHTAKING!!! This was easily the best of the three, this director rocks. I thought that too much stuff that was in the book had been cut out. Also, Hermione was getting on my nerves after awile, always clinging onto somebody. You`re a big girl, grow up! Also I didn`t care much for the new Dumbledore. Dumbledore IS NOT supposed to look scared! But besides those complaints, it was awesome. Malfoy was hilarious.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 3:27:40 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  It was great

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 3:19:47 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  It was an amazing movie, many people complain about the details that were left out from the book but you have to understand that there is only so much time that the director has to make this film, i thought it was absolutly BRILLIANT!!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 2:08:50 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  it is scary.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 1:01:35 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  I think it`s great if you`ve read the book. If not there might have been some holes in the plot for why some things happened. But definitely the best so far! Keep them coming :)

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 12:49:10 PM | (Age Not Specified) | F

  I don`t know if I saw the same film as everyone else (especially the movie critics who obviously have never read one the novels), but most of the most important elements of the book was absent from this movie. I also did not feel that it was dark and mysterious. I felt the movie was filmed just the oposite, light and airy. It jumped from scene to scene with no cohesiveness. I cannot believe that the director forgot to explain where the Marauders Map came from and who were its authors is beyond me. I was extremely disappointed with this adaption as it provided no character development (especially those characters that will play promi

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 11:05:32 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  It wasn`t the light, entertaining HP we`re used to but its a dark, dreary, rushed sort of film. I think the director wanted to make everyone grow up so he focused a lot of on the puppy love between hermione, ron and harry. Honestly, who really wants to see another awkward teenage moment? We`ve got HIlary Duff for that! Please bring back the HP we know and love...the 4th is the best book...so don`t screw up

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, June 7, 2004 11:01:18 AM | (age group: 50 or over.) | F

  The wizardry of the Potter novels is exceeded only by the director`s truthful depiction of the events