Write a Review

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Tuesday, July 6, 2004 8:07:42 AM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  Once i got past the missing plots from the book, I was able to view the movie as a `movie` and not a `book made into a movie`. Upon watching it the second time I found my enjoyment increasing! Special effects were greatly improved from the previous 2 films and the acting was improved upon as well! Note to self...don`t read Goblet of Fire the week before the movie comes out ;)

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 5, 2004 9:31:53 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  Wow, I loved it. I can`t wait for the rest of the movies to come out. Although the movie did leave out a lot of stuff from the book but the movie was still great and Daniel Radclif, cute.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 5, 2004 8:10:56 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  I think that the movie was very, very, good. I loved everything about the movie although it wasn`t very accurate to the book. The other director did a better job of directing the movie. The ending of the movie, I thought, was quite sudden and a bit confusing.By the way Emma looked HOT!!!!!!!! Overall I thought the movie was GREAT!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 5, 2004 6:11:45 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

  Clearly the book was way better, and the movie was a joke. i keep waiting for someone to yell "Gotcha!! Now here`s the real movie!" I have all the respect in the world for Ms. Rowling, but honestly!!!!! There was just too much wrong, and i think that the directer depended too much on the viewers to have read the books, i know that if i hadn`t read them i would have been lost for some parts. And PS: you can`t change the setting half way through the series!!!! Bring back Chris Columbus to direct. If they screw up #4 the way they did this i might cry!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 5, 2004 12:20:51 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  It was the best movie of the three. I loved it. I can`t wait to see the next Harry Potter movie!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 5, 2004 9:41:52 AM | (age group: 35–49)

  Well, I`ve read all the Harry Potter books, so far, to my son and we`ve seen all the movies, so far, and I must admit I was very, very disappointed in Azkaban. The acting was OK. I think Rupert Grint did the best job of all! However, there were key elements from the novel that were not included in the film. For instance, no mention was made of who created the Marauder`s Map in the movie. This is a very important part of the story. Also the relationship between Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs was not explored enough. The identity of Prongs is very important as it explains why Harry`s Patronus Charm takes the form of a stag. In my

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 4, 2004 11:20:43 AM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  It was awesome and im all ready on the 4th book. im a huge harry potter fan and my brother is an emma watson fan! buckbeak was funny how he looked and the demontors looked so real! it was awesome. keep up da good work.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Wednesday, June 30, 2004 4:13:46 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I LOVED IT!!! it is the best of the three so far! the actors have come soooo far since the first 2! i cant wait til the 4th one comes out! GO HARRY POTTER!!!!!!!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Wednesday, June 30, 2004 3:40:28 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I think it was exreme it was the best i meen the besr movie ever i cant wait for the next one to come out(i`ve watched it 13 times !!!)

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Wednesday, June 30, 2004 3:38:04 AM | (Age Not Specified) | F

  I absolutely loved it! Really Truly Breathtaking.