Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 10:40:57 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    i was dissapointed, but it was still a good movie. 1)they shouldn`d have made them wear regular clothes, it kind of runied the effect 2)the new actor who plays dumbledoor didn`t charaterise enough, he taked to easily, he wasn`t as "brethy" and the old actor, which gave him his rustic, old likem wise way about him 3)they said the movie is a lot "darker"..when they said this i thought they ment a deep kind of darkness, but they were literal..the movie was very dark as in the picture was darker. it was as dull as black and white, but somhow they captured the darkness of black and white in a colored film. it lost its magic anyways..i`m a cri

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 10:36:02 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    Did not like the new Director..

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 10:34:13 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I think it is the best movie ever thats at least what I think.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 10:11:13 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    I was expecting this movie to be great but sadly I have been disappointed by it greatly. Not every indy director is as talented as Quentin... this movie sux way too much, the shooting technique is horrible. In some scenes, characters in the background are totally distorted. Plus the cutting was bad as hell. People haven`t read it won`t have any idea what the plot is suppose to be. Why did they have to change the director? This guy should go be to direct R-rated Indy film ( I am not joking here. If you look up the bios of the director, that is the only film he ever directed.)

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 10:02:23 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    Makes me realize that it was only meant for kids....and not people in their twenties.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 9:33:26 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    Ten times better than the last two. Clean cut, fast past with some surprises of its own. Give this movie a chance!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 9:09:03 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    We think that this movie was probably the worst out of the three made. It had good graphics/effects but we thought that the end was horrible, and the going back in time part did not make any sense.ok well we would have to give this three out of five stars.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 8:39:17 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

    Great!! Best one yet!!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 7:45:53 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    it was amazing I loved it and you will too

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Friday, June 4, 2004 6:45:56 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    i totally loved it!!!!!!!!!!