Write a Review

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 25, 2004 1:50:53 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

  i work at a movie theatre and the only ppl who seem to like the movies are the girls who just like the 12 yr old actor. Sorry but this is one movie that i wished was over.r

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Friday, July 23, 2004 6:30:51 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  I enjoyed the third movie as much as the first two. Changes were expected since there was a new director in town. My only real complaint was the choppiness of certain scenes. Harry is alone, next second he`s walking with Prof. Lupin with no explaination as to why they`re talking like old friends. Things like that.... never the less, I`m seeing it for the second time tonight!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Friday, July 23, 2004 4:18:59 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  WE thought that Harry Potter was a great movie, full of action, and suspense!!!!I think that Harry Potter 3 was the Best on yet, I look forward to seeing Harry potter 4 with you!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:31:08 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  It was a very good movie but not quite as good as the previous two.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 19, 2004 8:04:57 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  in my opinion.. it was a crazyy movie! ahah i loved it! its way way better than the other two movies. who cares if a lot of things changed and if they missed out a couple things? its a movie. not a book! i noticed that each and everytime i watch the movies, its almost as if i fall in love with the characters! its almost as if they`re real! OH! and daniel, rupert and tom are really really hott! ahhaha and emma is super pretty! i wish i was like her! =p I LOVE HARRY POTTER!

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Monday, July 19, 2004 1:15:07 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  While most people thought it skipped to much from the books, I thought it took to much from the books, which made the movie less interesting. I do understand that getting every detail from the book would make it into a 9-hour long movie, and to be honest, I`m glad that they didn`t include Quidditch, because 10 minutes of blubbering over Gryffindor winning the Quidditch Cup could have been spent telling something interesting. 6.5 stars out of 10, because the Mexican director sucks at continuting the magical atmosphere of the books, and frankly, half the characters don`t look right.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 18, 2004 1:35:43 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  harry potter is so cool he makes so much money

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 18, 2004 12:55:09 PM | (age group: 35–49) | F

  I was disappointed. Overall enjoyable, but as her books become more complex, I expect that the movies will reflect this. As such, this movie did not do the book justice.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Sunday, July 18, 2004 2:44:48 AM | (age group: 25-34) | M

  Ok Wrap you head around this. Books are not Movies! Movies are not Books! Books are Books and Movies are Movies! I have now read the first 4 books after having seen this movie. This movie is fantastic, the best of the 3. Having said that it is also the most changed from the book but thats not a bad thing. The are both good in their own ways.

• Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

  Saturday, July 17, 2004 5:59:49 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  It was the bets movie ever, Dan, Emma and RUpert have grown into their characters alot!