Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:13:21 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I think that Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban give the dream world image to all the children and adults that see this magical world

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 22, 2004 8:50:15 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    i think its a good movie not great some parts are very lame make them a little maturer

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:30:27 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    i thougth that the movie was better when I saw it the second time. But it was too american. and the werewolfe was so un realisytic. andaniel`s fake crying was really bad, but hey, he still is the hotty.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:27:48 AM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    In my opinion the 3rd HP was the best book out of the 5 existing books, so naturally shouldn’t the 3rd movie live up to the previous HP movies? Anyways my point is there was only one QIDDITCH match, and it doesn’t follow the previous flow of the other 2 movies. For me it wrecked the 3rd installment of HP. Please bring back Chris Columbus, or give Alfonso some HP filming lessons.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 22, 2004 4:37:38 AM | (age group: 18-24) | M

    Definitely the BEST Harry Potter film yet...I was SOOOO pleased at the fact that the emotions of the film`s hero was shown to be raw and that he was in fact a "very human" teenager (we saw none of that in the first two movies)...another thing I loved was the cinematography of the film (very dark and `gothic-noir`)...the studio (WB) did us a favor by replacing Columbus with Alfonso Cuaron!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 8:14:02 PM | (Age Not Specified) | F

    The movie was great, Daniel Radcliffe is sooo hot.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 8:10:13 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    okay, what`s with dan`s FAKE crying?! and the dementors arent supposed to fly...they looked like E.T. under a cloak.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 7:20:08 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    i thot it was awesome, but i wish chris columbus was the director. alfonso is great, but the whole plan in the first and second movies is gone. i can`t really reconize anything and the plan is so strange. nothing is as i thot it would be. there were so many things left out!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 6:44:35 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

    it was excellent they could have added some parts from the book

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 5:36:52 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    I really think it was good,but not as good as L.O.T.R. Cuaron kind of made the Firebolt part up because it was suposed to be shown somewhere in the middle, but instead, it was at the very good. They also forgot to show Cho Chang in the Quidditch scene. But I still think H.P.A.T.P.O.A. WAS COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!