Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 2:41:06 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    It wasn`t as good as the first two, but it has more evil creatures. I would rate it above average, and worth seeing!! Also...this director SUCKS!!!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 2:38:17 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    very good.. but not as good as i expected

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 1:35:42 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    it was absolutly brilliant.... i loved it and the characters match the characters in the book so it was outstanding

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 1:33:39 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I think it was an amazing movie and i would like to watch it over and over again!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:26:41 AM | (age group: 2-17)

    I was disapointed. The other two movies were GREAT, and during the movie I was thinking "what the hell happened"? Maybe because it was a new director or something. I read the books and maybe thats why... because I expected more! They didn`t go into too much detail, like when lupin kept giveing harry the chocolate, they never explained why. Dumbledore, Hagrid, Snape, Mangalngal, were hardly in it. One quiddish game?!?!?! It was all about Harry and his friends when I know lots more happened in the book. But in all it was ok... I guess. Hopefully the 4th movie were be good...

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 6, 2004 1:51:52 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I thought it was so awsome. I was so into the movie and all tehj acotrs did such a good job. It was pretty true to the book allthough i wish they explained the padfoot, prongs.. etc thing at the end I was wating for that and it never happend so I am waiting for them to explain it in the fourth movie!!!! CANT WAIT!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Saturday, June 5, 2004 9:16:59 PM | (age group: 35–49) | M

    harry potter was great.you have to go see it

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Saturday, June 5, 2004 9:03:27 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    i think it wasnt the worst movie out of the three because they left out A LOT of scenes from the book and they didnt follow the book at all

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Saturday, June 5, 2004 8:54:44 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    IT WAS THE WORST MOVIE EVER! if u pay close attention u will see that there is 13 different mistakes.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Saturday, June 5, 2004 8:18:09 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

    A good movie on it`s own. But not a literal adaptation of the book.