Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 4:13:28 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    it was ok but not very good at all. For one thing, many important parts of the movie were deleted and it was as if they just took the main events and just filmed one after the other. Second, it was unrealistic. The dementors CAN`T fly and the Lupin werewolf was the worst werewolf EVER MADE! Third, some of the casting was very poor. I didn`t like the actor that played Lupin and the new Dumbledore didn`t do well either. Finally, some of the characters have really changed. Malfoy is always whining and Hermione is always clinging to the guys. She`s not independent like she used to be. This movie has romance in it and there`s no romance in the boo

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Monday, June 21, 2004 2:59:44 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    it needed to follow the books cause its BORING

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 10:19:37 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I thought this movie was GREAT it was just FANTASTIC I love how u mad the monsters(warewolves)scary...... I think this movie is the best yet, and i bet the Goblet of Fire will be even better

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:19:28 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I really enjoyed the movie. But i didn`t like the change in set like pow we are in the mountains, or pow hagrid has a bigger house, or pow they wear muggle clothing. What is with that? And even though they left out alot of details, you shouldn`t go into the movie with out reading the book anyway. And out of all the characters Ron (Rupert Grint) is the hottest one of all. Sorry Dan you just not foxy enough. -LuLu

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 8:08:21 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    I think it was AWESOME! I have to saw though, the QIDDITCH sucked. It was about 3 minutes long, no more.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 6:43:05 PM | (age group: 25-34) | M

    best harry yet. cuaron is a fantastic director, but he should have stuck to the original script.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:30:14 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    Simply put, the third installment in the Harry Potter series, was in my opinion the better of the three.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:52:45 PM | (Age Not Specified) | F

    wow...this movie was the best one yet!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:50:45 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    its was so much better than the first two...the animation! oh sooo good! harry`s hot.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Sunday, June 20, 2004 10:34:13 AM | (age group: 35–49) | M

    The best of the series so far.