Write a Review

Foxcatcher movie reviews

• 2

  Foxcatcher

  Saturday, February 25, 2023 10:06:53 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Incredibly boring and badly miscast. Ruffalo as a wrestler? A poodle could tear that beta wimp into pieces! Give us a break!

• 1

  Foxcatcher

  Wednesday, December 28, 2022 1:19:26 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  It never rises above the level of a made-for-tv movie from the 1980s. Boring and massively overpraised.

• 1

  Foxcatcher

  Tuesday, November 22, 2022 12:36:54 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Boring movie. Shallow characterizations. No suspense. No surprises. The casting of the boring, hate-mongering sadsack Ruffalo is clue that they weren't really trying with this one. Pathetic soy-boy Ruffalo has to be one of the very worst actors ever.

• 8

  Foxcatcher

  Monday, March 16, 2015 7:31:04 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Freaked me out!...a slow-paced thriller. Great performances by all, especially Tatum. Really well done.

• 2

  Foxcatcher

  Sunday, March 8, 2015 11:56:51 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  So tired of Hollywood trashy films. This film is an insult to the Oscar "Best Movie" category. Carrell was wooden. C. Tatum mumbled and sulked throughout the whole fim. Strong suggestion of gay relationship was completely untrue according to real Mark Schultz. Female characters barely alive. Stop going to these films until Hollywood recognizes true genius like "American Sniper" and Clint Eastwood and Bradley Cooper.

• 10

  Foxcatcher

  Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:21:57 PM | (age group: 50 or over.) | F

  I read e reviews before going to see it and I almost didn't go because of what the majority said but I must say I didn't agree with any of them I felt it was a good movie, not great but I'm glad I went but then I'm a sucker for true stories.

• 3

  Foxcatcher

  Tuesday, January 27, 2015 11:38:00 AM | (age group: 50 or over.) | F

  The acting was good I felt like I spent the longest "week" of my life watching this movie. I can't wait for the DVD to be released. I'm going to buy it because it's cheaper than sleeping pills and will be work much faster.

• 7

  Foxcatcher

  Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:10:55 AM | (age group: 50 or over.) | F

  True story. Later read about this and very impressed with the fact it seemed to follow the actual true story. Acting is excellent.

• Foxcatcher

  Sunday, January 18, 2015 4:55:08 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  omg, i wanted to walk out of this movie.. it was so friggen dull! i was sitting there thinking, this will get more interesting, this WILL get better..i thought that RIGHT till the end of the movie.. IT DID NOT. do NOT pay to see this movie!! seriously! wait till its on t.v. its very dull.

• Foxcatcher

  Thursday, January 8, 2015 9:25:03 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  A movie that, if not based on a true story, would have been too weird for the screen. Although it suffers most of the film moves at a tepid pace the real interest comes from how we see John du Pont react to someone so far out of his world and understanding. Rich movie that I didn't really grasp onto the first time but look forward to seeing again.