Write a Review

Jackie movie reviews

• 10

  Jackie

  Sunday, January 22, 2017 3:09:48 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  First of all, I hope Natalie Portman receives an Oscar for her portrayal. She was wonderful as Jackie, her body language, there was no flaws in her interpretation of how Jackie Kennedy spoke, even posture and the way she moved. I think the movie is a real succes: showing what Jackie went through mentally, physically after JFK's assassination: the shock, the grief, torments, the obligations to the family and to the people, protecting herself and her children, while thinking of making a history, the future, not to mention the people she had to deal with. Bravo! Great movie!

• 4

  Jackie

  Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:58:09 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I remember Jackie when she was first lady. This film tried hard but it missed the mark in so many important ways.

• 5

  Jackie

  Saturday, January 21, 2017 2:06:21 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  The volume should have been raised because she always talked softer then the norm. Good acting and story well told.

• 3

  Jackie

  Monday, January 9, 2017 12:02:56 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  What a snoozer. Basically Natalie Portman chain smoking and walking like a robot for 1.5 hours. There were also a ridiculous amount of close ups. I really love dramas and I don't need a lot of action to be engaged in a film, but this was pretty annoying to watch. Also, I usually love Natalie Portman.

• Jackie

  Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:54:28 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Disappointing. Slow moving, and you won't come away with more insight from behind the scenes. Don't waste time or money in this. The worst for Portman who is usually good...not this time.

• 5

  Jackie

  Thursday, December 29, 2016 1:09:22 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Im not sure how accurate the portrayal of Jacqueline Kennedy was however Natalie Portman comes across in the role as a very strong willed, complex,troubled character. Some of the audio was difficult primarily with Portmans part.The story goes from present to pass in an adequate way however the focus is continually on the same thing. Peter Saargaards expression never changed throughout the entire film and his character is important to the story.I think there was some good acting in this movie and the story bears importance in history however it lacked some cohesion and spark.

• 7

  Jackie

  Tuesday, December 27, 2016 9:25:58 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  As below

• Jackie

  Tuesday, December 27, 2016 5:58:06 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  This is a most interesting film. It is not a documentary. Natalie Portman deserves all kinds of accolades for an endlessly varied and nuanced performance. It is a take on the story of the once First Lady, her role, her image, her social class and mind set. But it also serves as a lens through which to restate, if not address, questions about the presidency of JFK and this is a big but understated part of the film. Where Jackie Kennedy struggles the most is in that space between public and private. She has a tremendous sense of entitlement but in getting it all loses everything private and in this film, at any rate, she is aware of that sacrifice. Perhaps the truest moment for Jackie is when she realizes that even she can't figure out how much of her behaviour is real and how much is performance during the days following the assassination. Who could?

• 9

  Jackie

  Monday, December 26, 2016 6:03:18 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Natalie Portman was outstanding in the role that many of us remember. I had no idea that Jackie was so controlling and insecure, along with being neurotic and minipulative about how her story would be told. Left the theatre really moved and shocked with these revelations.

• 4

  Jackie

  Thursday, December 8, 2016 5:10:55 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Natalie Portman was not a good choice for this role.