Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Score: 9 / 10

Release Date: June 4, 2004
Director: Alfonso Cuarón
Producer: Chris Columbus, David Heyman, Mark Radcliffe
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Emma Thompson, Julie Walters, Julie Christie, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 142 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 9:26:35 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I loved it!!! i think its the best one of the three that are made so far.the dementors were really freaky and looked so freakin real. i shuddered everu time they came on the screen.lol well, g2g bb cya at the next review,lol

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 8:30:18 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    The new director was not very good. It is too different from the first two. Plus, I didn`t like the new Dumbledore, he was very blah and didnt have as much character as the old one. Still a great movie, but its not true to the book. It kind of ruined some mental pictures of mine, but I bought advance tickets and enjoyed it all the same.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 8:18:48 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    I wish there would have been more detail. The trio did a good job.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 6:08:00 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!! the movie was better than the original. it was filled with nonstop action and plenty of good laughs. This a movie that teens and adults would enjoy its not a film for kids great! acting A+ story A+ directing A+

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 6:01:21 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I think that it was really good, but....they shouldn`t of cut too many parts out, i mean they totally cut out the ending where harry`s broom gets taken from him ect....but overall it was really really good , and rupert and daniel look soo damn fine now that he`s older!!;)(from mya-14,UK)

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 5:38:58 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    the dementors looked great and it stuck to the books story line

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 5:08:38 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    Emma Watson who plays Hermione in this movie got really hot! Dont worry. Im not one of those weird older guys who like little girls, im her age. Anyway, about the movie, I thought this is the best Harry Potter movie so far. Harry doesnt let anyone mess with with him. He even tells off and threatens his step parents and turns his weird mean aunt into a balloon without undoing the spell. DUDE!!!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 3:53:07 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    i think whoever actually liked the movie should try reading the book. I was extremely dissappointed with how much they left out. they should try getting a new director if they make another one and the new professor Dumbledore just didn`t fit the part. It was a sham.

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 1:24:45 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    sooo amazing!!! go see the movie! if you are doubting it dont...just go!

  • Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    Tuesday, June 8, 2004 12:59:16 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    DIRECTOR SUCKED!!!!!!!!!! Not only was it entirely different from the book but they changed 3 main characters and the location of the Womping willow from the previous movies. Director spent to much time with special effects and scenery then sticking to the first two excellent movies. POOR, POOR JOB on this movie hopefully its back to the way it was for the first two when they make the fourth.