Write a Review

Conan the Barbarian movie reviews

• Conan the Barbarian

  Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:43:27 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I watched this movie at Scarborough Town Centre in AVX. I liked it. I want to know if they're going to do the sequel and remake Conan the Destroyer? Also I would like to see them turn Conan the Adventurer into a movie also.

• 10

  Conan the Barbarian

  Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:53:44 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  The best film of the series. 3/5

• 1

  Conan the Barbarian

  Tuesday, September 13, 2011 4:16:00 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  A far cry from what Conan should have been, poor story and forced action sequences leads to a banal movie.

• 7

  Conan the Barbarian

  Saturday, September 10, 2011 6:37:03 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  Fast-paced action. A charismatic actor playing the lead role. The father-daughter god-to-be and witch characters brilliantly portrayed. Compared to so many other dull films that get favorably reviewed, this one deserved better treatment from the media. Film could have used better editing: too long with the snake monster in the water, what was the point of the battle in the ship, and sex scene was good but the last little bit unnecessary.Contrary to many reviewers, I thought the story well-told. All myth derives its power from cliche.

• 10

  Conan the Barbarian

  Thursday, September 8, 2011 7:44:28 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  The big, splashy production numbers lend much-needed class to this overly familiar story.

• 9

  Conan the Barbarian

  Tuesday, September 6, 2011 1:20:33 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Excellent job loved it!

• 1

  Conan the Barbarian

  Sunday, September 4, 2011 8:09:18 PM | (age group: 35–49) | M

  Worst piece of crap I ever seen. Even a B movie is better. The best part was Rose McGowan, she was great in the evil witch part. The original Conan was a classic. Arnold was a convincing barbarian, this new guy came across as stupid jock douche bag. save your $15.

• 3

  Conan the Barbarian

  Thursday, September 1, 2011 11:16:20 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

  Bad acting. There were hardly any dialogues and when they finally talked it was almost impossible to understand. The action was okay, but looked very fake sometimes.

• 1

  Conan the Barbarian

  Monday, August 29, 2011 1:01:42 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  terrible should have walked out ... but didn't kept waiting for it to get better, it never did

• 4

  Conan the Barbarian

  Monday, August 29, 2011 11:21:42 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Suneagle's Review 2*'s. WOW what the hell happened? I'll tell you what happened no passing the tourch to Mamoa no Arnold no Mileus! THE NEXT TIME STUDIOS WANT TO RE BOOT A FRANCHISE STOP FOR A SEC AND REALIZE ACTORS ARE BOUND TO IT AS WELL AS FANS!!! JUST AS CLASH OF THE TITANS WAS A CRAPPY RE-MAKE (No Majestical OWL, SWORD, HELMET, & SHIELD etc & Characters were all over the place, SO WAS THIS! WHATS NEXT MAD MAX WITH NO MELL GIBSON? RAMBO WITH NO STALLONE? DIE HARD WITH NO BRUCE WILLIS? BEAST MASTER WITH NO MARC SINGER?SHOULD OF PASSED THE TOURCH AND SHOULD OF USED SOMEONE BIGGER LIKE THE ROCK! Now that i got that off my chest. Fighting was not bad the kid they used for young Conan was AMA