Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Score: 7.75 / 10

Release Date: November 16, 2001
Director: Chris Columbus
Producer: David Heyman
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, John Cleese, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Richard Griffiths, Richard Harris, Ian Hart, John Hurt, Alan Rickman, Fiona Shaw, Maggie Smith, Julie Walters
Genre: Fantasy
Running Time: 152 minutes

Write a Review


Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone movie reviews

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:53:16 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    LORD OF THE RINGS IS WAYYYYYYYYYYY BETTER!!BUT DANIEL RADCLIFFE IS REALLY CUTE!PEACE OUT

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:15:13 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    This is a mockery of a movie. Worst ever. Spend that $10 on Lord of the Rings, for your sake.

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:13:43 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    Don`t waste your cash. Lord of the Rings all the way!

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Sunday, January 13, 2002 12:21:55 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    Awsome the best

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Saturday, January 12, 2002 3:39:25 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    I have seen Harry Potter and Lord of teh Rings and I would have to say that Harry Potter is made from a story into a movie better. The best movie of its century! GO HARRY POTTER! I just can`t wait till the rest of the movies come out!

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:36:04 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    This movie was the most amazing movie I have ever seen, along with Lord Of The Rings. The effects were great and the acting was wonderful!

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:05:32 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

    I thought that this movie was completely mindless. It`s quite obviously meant to be enjoyed by those with a below average intelligence level (ie. kids under 6). The one thing that I thought would make it worth while, the special effects, where also a huge disappointment. The computer generated graphics where second rate, making the film appear very low budget.

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Friday, January 11, 2002 5:11:05 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I think that it was an excellent movie, it decribed everything in the book very and detaily well.

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Friday, January 11, 2002 4:41:29 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

    The Best.

  • Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

    Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:08:22 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    I thought the movie was good, but the book was better